petsild napsal:

Jo Edge mě rozhodně překvapil, na akrobata detailním zpracováním.
Hned druhej stroj po Rogalu s kterým mám 200 fps plus nad Supercarrier.
Určitě by měl radost i Martin Šonka, že tenhle sport znovu ožil alespoň virtuálně.
Co mi nejde namapovat jsou brzdy na tlačítka, políčko s nabídkou nejde rozkliknout.
Ještě na prezentačním videu se kouše animace vrtule, tím ale tahle vypuštěná verse netrpí.

- Updated carrier launch procedures to support more carriers (DCS:Supercarrier workarounds included)

Added Ticonderoga and Arleigh Burke as NTDS (datalink host) capable

We have reported the issues to the team and they are discussing and working out what went wrong. At this point a hot fix is being considered and as soon as I know more I will let you all know.

Looks guys, we royally messed this one up, we are working to fix the issues and get them out to you, as well as figure out how this went so far out of whack again.

I'm sorry guys, its totally unacceptable, you guys have heard it hear before I know. We are working on getting a hotfix, soon as we know what can and will be done, we will let you know. Again, all I can do is apologize. We are putting new checks and balances in, but obviously they are not anywhere where they need to be yet. Thanks guys.

We have been working on a new regression testing system for the EA products like the Hornet and Viper, obviously, something majorly misfired on this one, I can't say anything more than sorry and we are working on getting a hotfix for this.

Sorry everyone - these patchnotes are inaccurate and represent a newer build that we hoped to include.

We're rebuilding all of the lighting in the F-14 and Viggen to make it look nice again. It will be done by the next patch - but these last two patches have just been too quick for us to keep up. Some lighting changes are included in this (temporary, so you can at least see some of the lights..)

We'll see if we can publish a hotfix on the forums.

Dear all, our apologies for a bit of a confusion, these three items about light changes in the changelog are wrong:

• Temporary fix to make annunciator lights visible for DCS lighting changes
• Tweaked flood light intensity
• Fixed AOA indexer visibility

They were meant for the next build that did not make it into this patch anymore. My apologies for that. It was an oversight of mine to not remove them in time.

The good news is, that despite this patch appearing maybe even slightly worse, we are closing in on a lighting fix, which will hopefully come with the next patch. Thank you all for your very kind patience, as always.

We're overhauling all internal and external lighting for both the Viggen and Tomcat to fit the new DCS lighting system! Hang tight.

Hi fellow DCS pilots,

I would like to post a mini update addressing the lighting-related issues in the Community A-4E in the latest Open Beta of DCS World. I’m sure most of you who are using the Open Beta branch of the DCS World are aware of the light issue plaguing a number of modules, particularly lighting and annunciator elements in various modules. The Community A-4E is no exception. The annunciators on the glare shield and the caution panel are significantly harder to read in the sunlight.

Our preliminary analysis shows that the issue is plaguing 3D elements that are marked with the "transparent_self_illum" material property. This material type was used in the elements mentioned above in the A-4E. The rendering of elements tagged with this material property has changed in the recent OB patches and we are unsure if this is an intentional renderer change or if this is a rendering bug. If this is indeed a bug, we believe that an official patch for DCS is on its way so that everyone can experience the hard work of all the various DCS developers once again. For the benefit of community information, negating this issue in the A-4E would require switching the material property used to another which could achieve similar results and several texture updates to adapt to the requirements of the newly chosen material type. While this might not seem like an unachievable task, it does still require the time of the development team to code, repaint the textures and for testers to verify the changes.
.
As we are unsure if this is a temporary or permanent change, we do not wish to issue an official patch at the moment and only to roll it back next week. If this is indeed a temporary issue, this would be an unnecessary inconvenience placed on the users of the A-4E when some patience would have served us well. Not to mention that due to the mode of distribution available to use, each patch would involve the user to manually undertake several steps to have their A-4E installation kept up to date. We would, therefore, try to minimise the number of patches issued to reduce the opportunity for version disparities among users. This would also assist in managing the workload on the team and allow us to pursue more features instead of this constant task of rendering tweaks.

We hope this information would help provide more insight into the Community A-4E development process and we will keep you updated should there be more information to be made available.

More units coming to ChinaAssetPack

How I land the AV-8B Harrier on the USS Tarawa in DCS World (CASE I pattern).

We're proud of our simulation products! Try them out for free between the 19th and 25th, and ENJOY the Tomcat and Viggen!!! :) Make sure to let us know what you think!! Trial event in partnership with Eagle Dynamics and DCS World.